Wind Power Micro Generators may not be good for your wealth?
We have nothing against micro generation using wind turbines, but we am still searching for a case study in lowland Britain that demonstrates a viable return on the carbon and monetary investment.
There will be many examples of upland generators that are producing a reasonable return on the investment required, but we don’t happen to live on a hilltop, and indeed not many of us do.
How does one define upland? Check outside and see if it’s blowing a gale. If the answer is yes on more days than not, you are probably living in the “Uplands” Unfortunately even if you are locally in what might be considered an upland location it doesn’t directly follow that a wind turbine will be viable proposition every time – there may be too much wind for too much of the time – these things seem to be just like the rest of us and need a “Goldilocks Environment” to thrive.
On balance sticking up a wind turbine on top of a hill in a clear air-stream, unaffected by local turbulence is an almost sure winner. Stick it up next to a building in a local hollow and in the turbulence downstream of a copse is not such a good idea.
Sticking up a micro turbine on a suburban gable end seems to do little more than make a declaration that one espouses the ideal of green renewable energy generation, but the suspicion has to be that the money would have been far better invested in a purpose built wind farm in a much more suitable location.
Is that an “eat your heart out moment” for David Cameron?
Our conclusion – spend the money on a scheme that is verifiably producing a real “carbon return” by producing more renewable energy over its lifetime than was expended in its creation. If that doesn’t seem possible buy a container full of low energy light bulbs and give them away?










Comment (0)